Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
340 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 100 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29015 | SC Fairfield SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29384 | SC Laurens SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29450 | SC Berkeley SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29458 | SC Charleston SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29468 | SC Berkeley SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29809 | SC Aiken SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29856 | SC Aiken SC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 340 |
| 29530 | SC Florence SC | 99.9322 | Banking-desert dominant | #17 of 20,307 | #2 of 340 |
| 29805 | SC Aiken SC | 99.8274 | Banking-desert dominant | #40 of 20,307 | #3 of 340 |
| 29742 | SC York SC | 99.4361 | Banking-desert dominant | #81 of 20,307 | #4 of 340 |
| 29635 | SC Greenville SC | 99.3977 | Banking-desert dominant | #86 of 20,307 | #5 of 340 |
| 29916 | SC Hampton SC | 97.6483 | Banking-desert dominant | #157 of 20,307 | #6 of 340 |
| 29001 | SC Clarendon SC | 96.9268 | Banking-desert dominant | #186 of 20,307 | #7 of 340 |
| 29426 | SC Charleston SC | 96.6082 | Banking-desert dominant | #196 of 20,307 | #8 of 340 |
| 29130 | SC Fairfield SC | 95.6553 | Banking-desert dominant | #227 of 20,307 | #9 of 340 |
| 29335 | SC Spartanburg SC | 94.0583 | Banking-desert dominant | #267 of 20,307 | #10 of 340 |
| 29332 | SC Laurens SC | 93.4898 | Banking-desert dominant | #281 of 20,307 | #11 of 340 |
| 29645 | SC Laurens SC | 92.7894 | Banking-desert dominant | #296 of 20,307 | #12 of 340 |
| 29111 | SC Clarendon SC | 92.5931 | Banking-desert dominant | #302 of 20,307 | #13 of 340 |
| 29847 | SC Edgefield SC | 92.2701 | Banking-desert dominant | #308 of 20,307 | #14 of 340 |
| 29436 | SC Berkeley SC | 91.29 | Banking-desert dominant | #323 of 20,307 | #15 of 340 |
| 29845 | SC McCormick SC | 90.0299 | Banking-desert dominant | #350 of 20,307 | #16 of 340 |
| 29044 | SC Richland SC | 89.5561 | Banking-desert dominant | #359 of 20,307 | #17 of 340 |
| 29685 | SC Pickens SC | 89.1748 | Banking-desert dominant | #365 of 20,307 | #18 of 340 |
| 29374 | SC Spartanburg SC | 88.7126 | Banking-desert dominant | #372 of 20,307 | #19 of 340 |
| 29431 | SC Berkeley SC | 88.5505 | Banking-desert dominant | #374 of 20,307 | #20 of 340 |
| 29689 | SC Anderson SC | 88.4667 | Banking-desert dominant | #375 of 20,307 | #21 of 340 |
| 29945 | SC Beaufort SC | 88.1092 | Banking-desert dominant | #383 of 20,307 | #22 of 340 |
| 29831 | SC Aiken SC | 86.2536 | Banking-desert dominant | #408 of 20,307 | #23 of 340 |
| 29429 | SC Charleston SC | 85.2231 | Banking-desert dominant | #428 of 20,307 | #24 of 340 |
| 29481 | SC Colleton SC | 84.4103 | Banking-desert dominant | #448 of 20,307 | #25 of 340 |
| 29125 | SC Clarendon SC | 83.7115 | Banking-desert dominant | #464 of 20,307 | #26 of 340 |
| 29714 | SC Chester SC | 83.0383 | Banking-desert dominant | #474 of 20,307 | #27 of 340 |
| 29178 | SC Newberry SC | 80.0193 | Banking-desert dominant | #523 of 20,307 | #28 of 340 |
| 29058 | SC Lancaster SC | 79.534 | Banking-desert dominant | #528 of 20,307 | #29 of 340 |
| 29032 | SC Kershaw SC | 79.0139 | Banking-desert dominant | #534 of 20,307 | #30 of 340 |
| 29128 | SC Sumter SC | 76.7088 | Banking-desert dominant | #578 of 20,307 | #31 of 340 |
| 29661 | SC Greenville SC | 76.6794 | Banking-desert dominant | #580 of 20,307 | #32 of 340 |
| 29920 | SC Beaufort SC | 75.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #611 of 20,307 | #33 of 340 |
| 29053 | SC Lexington SC | 74.9198 | Banking-desert dominant | #614 of 20,307 | #34 of 340 |
| 29372 | SC Spartanburg SC | 73.1129 | Banking-desert dominant | #643 of 20,307 | #35 of 340 |
| 29080 | SC Sumter SC | 70.054 | Potential-desert dominant | #687 of 20,307 | #36 of 340 |
| 29129 | SC Saluda SC | 69.6146 | Potential-desert dominant | #697 of 20,307 | #37 of 340 |
| 29940 | SC Beaufort SC | 68.2145 | Banking-desert dominant | #721 of 20,307 | #38 of 340 |
| 29583 | SC Florence SC | 67.877 | Potential-desert dominant | #729 of 20,307 | #39 of 340 |
| 29581 | SC Horry SC | 65.5231 | Banking-desert dominant | #776 of 20,307 | #40 of 340 |
| 29114 | SC Florence SC | 64.7898 | Potential-desert dominant | #787 of 20,307 | #41 of 340 |
| 29568 | SC Horry SC | 64.2321 | Banking-desert dominant | #798 of 20,307 | #42 of 340 |
| 29070 | SC Lexington SC | 63.796 | Mixed financial access | #811 of 20,307 | #43 of 340 |
| 29479 | SC Berkeley SC | 63.594 | Potential-desert dominant | #815 of 20,307 | #44 of 340 |
| 29322 | SC Spartanburg SC | 61.5531 | Banking-desert dominant | #869 of 20,307 | #45 of 340 |
| 29107 | SC Orangeburg SC | 59.6078 | Mixed financial access | #917 of 20,307 | #46 of 340 |
| 29123 | SC Lexington SC | 58.8853 | Potential-desert dominant | #932 of 20,307 | #47 of 340 |
| 29052 | SC Richland SC | 58.3146 | Potential-desert dominant | #948 of 20,307 | #48 of 340 |
| 29682 | SC Pickens SC | 57.6066 | Potential-desert dominant | #968 of 20,307 | #49 of 340 |
| 29704 | SC York SC | 57.5506 | Potential-desert dominant | #970 of 20,307 | #50 of 340 |
| 29541 | SC Florence SC | 56.5321 | Banking-desert dominant | #985 of 20,307 | #51 of 340 |
| 29593 | SC Darlington SC | 55.9588 | Banking-desert dominant | #1,006 of 20,307 | #52 of 340 |
| 29168 | SC Sumter SC | 55.0653 | Banking-desert dominant | #1,034 of 20,307 | #53 of 340 |
| 29009 | SC Kershaw SC | 54.2291 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,051 of 20,307 | #54 of 340 |
| 29054 | SC Lexington SC | 53.9908 | Mixed financial access | #1,060 of 20,307 | #55 of 340 |
| 29164 | SC Aiken SC | 50.9149 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,178 of 20,307 | #56 of 340 |
| 29435 | SC Colleton SC | 50.0 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,242 of 20,307 | #57 of 340 |
| 29437 | SC Dorchester SC | 50.0 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,242 of 20,307 | #57 of 340 |
| 29448 | SC Dorchester SC | 50.0 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,242 of 20,307 | #57 of 340 |
| 29152 | SC Sumter SC | 49.9594 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,251 of 20,307 | #58 of 340 |
| 29655 | SC Anderson SC | 49.0084 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,379 of 20,307 | #59 of 340 |
| 29935 | SC Beaufort SC | 48.6461 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,408 of 20,307 | #60 of 340 |
| 29628 | SC Abbeville SC | 48.3315 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,435 of 20,307 | #61 of 340 |
| 29102 | SC Clarendon SC | 46.1789 | Mixed financial access | #1,575 of 20,307 | #62 of 340 |
| 29927 | SC Jasper SC | 46.0768 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,578 of 20,307 | #63 of 340 |
| 29356 | SC Spartanburg SC | 45.618 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,599 of 20,307 | #64 of 340 |
| 29692 | SC Greenwood SC | 45.0088 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,634 of 20,307 | #65 of 340 |
| 29676 | SC Oconee SC | 44.3842 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,665 of 20,307 | #66 of 340 |
| 29020 | SC Kershaw SC | 43.7124 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,703 of 20,307 | #67 of 340 |
| 29078 | SC Kershaw SC | 42.6244 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,760 of 20,307 | #68 of 340 |
| 29404 | SC Charleston SC | 42.606 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,763 of 20,307 | #69 of 340 |
| 29018 | SC Orangeburg SC | 42.5206 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,768 of 20,307 | #70 of 340 |
| 29591 | SC Florence SC | 40.7576 | Mixed financial access | #1,871 of 20,307 | #71 of 340 |
| 29527 | SC Horry SC | 40.7499 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,872 of 20,307 | #72 of 340 |
| 29843 | SC Bamberg SC | 40.1581 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,903 of 20,307 | #73 of 340 |
| 29006 | SC Lexington SC | 40.0267 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,909 of 20,307 | #74 of 340 |
| 29472 | SC Dorchester SC | 39.6834 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,925 of 20,307 | #75 of 340 |
| 29137 | SC Aiken SC | 38.5548 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,978 of 20,307 | #76 of 340 |
| 29069 | SC Darlington SC | 38.1647 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,008 of 20,307 | #77 of 340 |
| 29067 | SC Lancaster SC | 37.9444 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,026 of 20,307 | #78 of 340 |
| 29180 | SC Fairfield SC | 37.1607 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,062 of 20,307 | #79 of 340 |
| 29104 | SC Lee SC | 36.5302 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,083 of 20,307 | #80 of 340 |
| 29729 | SC Chester SC | 36.3365 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,092 of 20,307 | #81 of 340 |
| 29492 | SC Berkeley SC | 35.8656 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,112 of 20,307 | #82 of 340 |
| 29376 | SC Spartanburg SC | 34.1669 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,206 of 20,307 | #83 of 340 |
| 29690 | SC Greenville SC | 34.1202 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,211 of 20,307 | #84 of 340 |
| 29161 | SC Florence SC | 34.1188 | Mixed financial access | #2,212 of 20,307 | #85 of 340 |
| 29474 | SC Colleton SC | 33.5265 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,249 of 20,307 | #86 of 340 |
| 29918 | SC Hampton SC | 33.2424 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,261 of 20,307 | #87 of 340 |
| 29860 | SC Aiken SC | 32.8971 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,276 of 20,307 | #88 of 340 |
| 29684 | SC Anderson SC | 32.7948 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,281 of 20,307 | #89 of 340 |
| 29902 | SC Beaufort SC | 32.1861 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,319 of 20,307 | #90 of 340 |
| 29669 | SC Anderson SC | 32.1327 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,321 of 20,307 | #91 of 340 |
| 29030 | SC Calhoun SC | 31.5012 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,354 of 20,307 | #92 of 340 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →