Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
7 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 7 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29058 | SC Lancaster SC | 79.534 | Banking-desert dominant | #528 of 20,307 | #29 of 340 |
| 29032 | SC Kershaw SC | 79.0139 | Banking-desert dominant | #534 of 20,307 | #30 of 340 |
| 29128 | SC Sumter SC | 76.7088 | Banking-desert dominant | #578 of 20,307 | #31 of 340 |
| 29020 | SC Kershaw SC | 43.7124 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,703 of 20,307 | #67 of 340 |
| 29078 | SC Kershaw SC | 42.6244 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,760 of 20,307 | #68 of 340 |
| 29067 | SC Lancaster SC | 37.9444 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,026 of 20,307 | #78 of 340 |
| 29010 | SC Lee SC | 0.5363 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,948 of 20,307 | #210 of 340 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →