Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
14 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 14 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31328 | GA Chatham GA | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 612 |
| 31312 | GA Effingham GA | 64.2872 | Banking-desert dominant | #795 of 20,307 | #48 of 612 |
| 31407 | GA Chatham GA | 37.5591 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,039 of 20,307 | #109 of 612 |
| 31419 | GA Chatham GA | 12.0846 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,064 of 20,307 | #208 of 612 |
| 31408 | GA Chatham GA | 6.8178 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,919 of 20,307 | #240 of 612 |
| 31405 | GA Chatham GA | 3.0164 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #5,839 of 20,307 | #284 of 612 |
| 31415 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0182 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #7,706 of 20,307 | #351 of 612 |
| 31406 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31404 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31401 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31410 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31322 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31411 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
| 31403 | GA Chatham GA | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #352 of 612 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →