Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
36 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 36 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27816 | NC Nash NC | 100.0 | Banking-desert dominant | #1 of 20,307 | #1 of 639 |
| 27525 | NC Granville NC | 87.1147 | Banking-desert dominant | #398 of 20,307 | #29 of 639 |
| 27882 | NC Nash NC | 73.5326 | Banking-desert dominant | #633 of 20,307 | #44 of 639 |
| 27549 | NC Franklin NC | 70.4187 | Banking-desert dominant | #684 of 20,307 | #47 of 639 |
| 27557 | NC Nash NC | 64.9299 | Potential-desert dominant | #783 of 20,307 | #52 of 639 |
| 27596 | NC Franklin NC | 38.0118 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,021 of 20,307 | #117 of 639 |
| 27610 | NC Wake NC | 22.4372 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,984 of 20,307 | #180 of 639 |
| 27597 | NC Franklin NC | 19.8777 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,190 of 20,307 | #196 of 639 |
| 28366 | NC Sampson NC | 19.83 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,195 of 20,307 | #197 of 639 |
| 27527 | NC Johnston NC | 17.1314 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,455 of 20,307 | #217 of 639 |
| 27616 | NC Wake NC | 13.686 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,841 of 20,307 | #241 of 639 |
| 27576 | NC Johnston NC | 13.1592 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,907 of 20,307 | #248 of 639 |
| 27587 | NC Wake NC | 11.7342 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,122 of 20,307 | #259 of 639 |
| 27591 | NC Wake NC | 11.3461 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,172 of 20,307 | #264 of 639 |
| 27589 | NC Warren NC | 9.6355 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,407 of 20,307 | #275 of 639 |
| 27614 | NC Wake NC | 8.3114 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,634 of 20,307 | #284 of 639 |
| 27522 | NC Granville NC | 7.4797 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,780 of 20,307 | #289 of 639 |
| 27603 | NC Wake NC | 5.5798 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #5,171 of 20,307 | #308 of 639 |
| 27571 | NC Wake NC | 2.9186 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #5,872 of 20,307 | #345 of 639 |
| 27529 | NC Wake NC | 1.8339 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,250 of 20,307 | #367 of 639 |
| 27520 | NC Johnston NC | 1.1948 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,526 of 20,307 | #383 of 639 |
| 27577 | NC Johnston NC | 0.668 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,833 of 20,307 | #389 of 639 |
| 27606 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27615 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27513 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27612 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27604 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27609 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27511 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27607 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27545 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27539 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27518 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27601 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27608 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
| 27605 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →