Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
8 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 8 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74536 | OK Pushmataha OK | 49.2954 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,358 of 20,307 | #32 of 365 |
| 74547 | OK Pittsburg OK | 48.4282 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,429 of 20,307 | #36 of 365 |
| 74570 | OK Hughes OK | 40.8613 | Potential-desert dominant | #1,862 of 20,307 | #48 of 365 |
| 74553 | OK Pittsburg OK | 18.7566 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,296 of 20,307 | #88 of 365 |
| 74501 | OK Pittsburg OK | 15.9027 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,580 of 20,307 | #98 of 365 |
| 74462 | OK Haskell OK | 9.5643 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,423 of 20,307 | #118 of 365 |
| 74432 | OK McIntosh OK | 2.7338 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #5,936 of 20,307 | #156 of 365 |
| 74578 | OK Latimer OK | 1.0221 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,625 of 20,307 | #168 of 365 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →