Public records are free to view. Higher pressure reflects greater measured banking-access constraints; it is not an overall quality rating. Ranks below preserve the source’s comparison universe and ties.
14 eligible ZIPs in this report. First 14 shown.
No matching eligible record
A missing record is not a statement about banking access. This publication covers 20,307 eligible ZIPs, rather than every U.S. postal ZIP.
| ZIP profile | State / source county | Pressure index | ZIP classification | National pressure rank | State pressure rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27207 | NC Chatham NC | 62.5256 | Potential-desert dominant | #845 of 20,307 | #55 of 639 |
| 27562 | NC Wake NC | 43.4379 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #1,720 of 20,307 | #98 of 639 |
| 27355 | NC Randolph NC | 31.4451 | Potential-desert dominant | #2,360 of 20,307 | #136 of 639 |
| 27312 | NC Chatham NC | 23.4149 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #2,911 of 20,307 | #174 of 639 |
| 27713 | NC Durham NC | 20.1333 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,170 of 20,307 | #193 of 639 |
| 27332 | NC Harnett NC | 14.7481 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #3,719 of 20,307 | #233 of 639 |
| 27516 | NC Chatham NC | 12.151 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,056 of 20,307 | #255 of 639 |
| 27523 | NC Wake NC | 10.4331 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #4,288 of 20,307 | #269 of 639 |
| 27540 | NC Wake NC | 5.9999 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #5,081 of 20,307 | #299 of 639 |
| 27330 | NC Lee NC | 2.1496 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,123 of 20,307 | #361 of 639 |
| 27502 | NC Wake NC | 0.7523 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #6,781 of 20,307 | #388 of 639 |
| 27325 | NC Moore NC | 0.4016 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #7,076 of 20,307 | #396 of 639 |
| 27517 | NC Chatham NC | 0.0158 | Non-desert with desert exposure | #7,714 of 20,307 | #416 of 639 |
| 27519 | NC Wake NC | 0.0 | Non-desert dominant | #7,778 of 20,307 | #418 of 639 |
Page 1
Source year: 2025 in the governed ZIP profile view. Exported October 13, 2026; the export date is not an observation date. Population figures are allocated estimates; groups can overlap. Sources and interpretation →